hot take
@funnypanja It's either a cyborg attracted to "both" (i.e. all) genders,
OR
it's a cyborg attracted to both humans and machines.
---
Or both. Both is good.
hot take
@funnypanja True. But if we compare to gender*, then being a cyborg could be considered parallel to being non-binary - just in relation to the false binary of "man vs machine".
(* gender is, IMO, similarly hard to define as humanity. "What defines being human?" is essentially the same question as "What defines being [insert gender]?".)
hot take
@zatnosk aren't cyborg part human, instead of being a interely different category?