Tsatnosk is a user on manowar.social. You can follow them or interact with them if you have an account anywhere in the fediverse.
here's an entirely pointless point:
imagine a graph, X axis is the gender with masculine and feminine as points -1 and 1, Y is how intensely you are that gender with an average at 1.
now of course the two points are placed arbitrarily, that's why it's *socially constructed*.
now add a dimension Z repeating that process for every way of expressing gender
nonbinary conventionally means it's not in some radius around (X/Y) -1;1 and 1;1, or inconsistent in Z, but really everyone is some of it.
now honestly, do that make sense to you? relatively to the equivalent typical sociology text? would you read/share more of it?
Tsatnosk
@zatnosk
@CobaltVelvet I have a more-than-average mathematical oriented brain, with a tendency to understand stuff in graphs like that or related vectors - and I had to read it twice to understand it. Maybe if there were images along with the explanations, it would be easier to grok?
