Tsatnosk is a user on manowar.social. You can follow them or interact with them if you have an account anywhere in the fediverse.
Tsatnosk
@zatnosk
@aral Dammit, this undermines the double meaning in my decentweb.eu * project name. But you have good arguments.
*) even though I have a bit of content on the domain, the project is far from finished.
@aral Ah, that's a good angle.
I personally use decentralized as an umbrella term for anything not-centralized, and then specify federated or p2p when applicable.
In your terms, can a p2p network be non-egalitarian? If so, is it an overlapping definition or subset?
(Thanks! I'd love to have your feedback once I get it filled out somewhat - it'll probably take a while, though. Life can be demanding regarding time.)
@zatnosk I’d say p2p and egalitarian are synonymous. I feel “egalitarian” would be easier for a person without technical knowledge to understand and it puts the focus on the aspect of the topology that I feel is most important for social reasons.
@Concerned_Commy @zatnosk Indeed. And yet, language isn’t a static construct either. You throw something out there and either it sticks or it slips off into the ether of could-have-beens :)
Tagging this with #decentwebeu so I can find it later, when I need to remember terminology.
@zatnosk I like that double meaning also ;) I’m not saying we have to stop using the existing terms; only that I feel “egalitarian” describes a p2p topology in an accessible and expressive manner :)
(Best of luck with your project, by the way. Please feel free to ping me updates any time if you like.)